Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that educators should take facts into consideration when it comes to teaching barely after examined the ideas, concepts, methods and so forth, which could patronize those facts. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general agreement on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that individuals could act wisely and make a sound decision if they encounter with reality and facts. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that educators play a dominant role in every given society and people who learn are pillars of that society. Indeed, what they will learn is of utmost critical importance because it can enhance their personal life and career in near future. Broadly speaking, when students regardless of their level of study do not realize deeply the concepts, ideas, and crowds of other things related to that subject, they could not afford to understand the real meaning behind the subjects not only in that field but also in their lives. For instance, one of the major goals of learning facts is that people should be able to use them in real life and if they do not make an effort to crack the meaning behind facts, they will run into a huge problem and do something wrong in the personal lives. To elucidate more on this issue, educators should encourage people to learn fundamental concepts, ideas and so on, which not only can make people decide their path but also can make them analyze facts meticulously and precisely and become knowledgeable in near future.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that there is a close correlation between learning facts and becoming successful. As a matter fact, vast majorities of people bend over backward to make a progress and become successful in their lives. Generally phrased, if educators coerce people to learn basic ideas, indeed, they indirectly help them become successful. In fact, hardly ever people can touch progress without taking facts into account. As a vivid example, if a businessman wants to have a prosperous career or even run a successful business, he/she should be taught basic needs by the experienced educators and confront with facts in order to recognize and seize great opportunities. Delve further into the issue, if students do not have any information about facts and its fundamental and necessary rules, it could have deleterious effects on their lives and create a gap between them and progress day in day out.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, myriads of facts happen by experience. It means that a plethora of people face facts just by their previous experiences and do not need to know more about a fundamental need. As far as I am concerned, taking various ideas, concepts and so forth could not only be waste of time but also could be annoying for some people and make them confused. In such case, myriads of people will lose their enthusiasm to learn facts.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that students or people need to appreciate concepts in order to perceive facts in their real lives. Indeed, this methodology will make people do not something wrong and not to make an idiot decision. In addition, it will provide fertile ground for people to reach success and make progress day in day out.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
2017-07-01 | test_niladri | 66 | view |
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 66
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. Do you agree or disagree? 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people's lives have already taken place. 73
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, broadly speaking, for instance, in addition, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2936.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96785109983 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67427539315 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470389170897 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9563887328 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.652173913 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6956521739 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177246808151 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053188407398 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436054474041 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105850332262 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373794393265 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.