Throw away culture
As you know, one of the most controversial today is related to Throw- away culture. It’s argued that we are filling up our environment with a lot of rubbish and plastic bags. Environmentalists are campaigning for “ reduce, recycle and re- use”. In Vietnam, a large number of people are leading us to a throwaway society. The major reason for this opinion is that people are removing so many plastic bags and rubbish into the environment and I believe that people’s awareness is the main cause of making our environment polluted and making this culture increasingly grown in popularity. For example, when we don’t want to keep a plastic bags, we usually throw it away from right from the place we are standing. However, the second cause is that plastic bags are cheap and easy to buy, sellers will make more profit if they use plastic bags. And you know, paper bags are not really popular in our country because of its prices. I’m sure that everybody knows plastic which is a challenge to an environment, is hard to disintegrate. One good illustration is that plastic needs about one thousand years to disappear.
So what should we do to solve this problem?
From my point of view, I believe that there are so many measures to solve this problem. Honestly, the government should ban manufacturers from making plastic bags and we can replace it with paper bags. Because paper bags are easier to recycle. Furthermore, slogans are needed in public places to people who want to protect the environment and don’t want. At the same time, the government should place more bins in the street. It will be easier for people to put rubbish in when we are walking. For example, in some developed countries such as Singapore, Germany every road are as clean as a new pin and don't have even a bags.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Afdalah Harris | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Afdalah Harris | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As you know, one of the most controversi...
^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... recycle and re- use'. In Vietnam, a large number of people are leading us to a throwaway so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about one thousand years to disappear. So what should we do to solve this probl...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at should we do to solve this problem? From my point of view, I believe that th...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and we can replace it with paper bags. Because paper bags are easier to recycle. Furth...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...very road are as clean as a new pin and dont have even a bags.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, honestly, however, if, really, second, so, for example, such as, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80573248408 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73611364957 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53821656051 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 48.5380403192 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850252595672 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237375904003 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614461144649 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0403744565074 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570981039663 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.