The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the given column chart reveals the amount of time which British spent on telephone in various categories over the course of 7 years starting in 1995.
Overall, the time using of telephone call tended to rise in this period. In addition, local-fixed line was the most used facility in all the time surveyed.
It can be seen from the chart that ,in 1995 the figure of local fixed-line was significantly higher than that of other types, standing at well over 70 billions. In stark contrast, the figure for mobile was merely around 3 billions, while national and international fixed-line stood at roughly 38 billions. In the year 1996, local fixed line grew rapidly before it reached a peak of 90 billion minutes. Likewise, in the same period, the UK witnessed markedly climbs in national and international fixed-line and mobiles. Specifically, the figure for the former was 50 billions, while the latter saw a threefold increase.
In terms of local-fixed line, after reaching its peak, it declined gradually before finishing at the bottom out at approximately 72 billion minutes. This was still significantly higher in comparison with national and international fixed-line and mobiles which reached at the highest point in 2002. To be precise, the figures for these were roughly 61 and 46 billion minutes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | elizabeth.queijo | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-02 | Abdullah Sarder | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-01 | damladogan | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | romaitoazhar | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-18 | TheBarbarios | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Explain some of the way in which humans are damaging the enviroment.What can governments do to adress these problems. What can individual do. 61
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
- : Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- : Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d. It can be seen from the chart that ,in 1995 the figure of local fixed-line w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, still, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11059907834 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84429995964 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594470046083 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2458908167 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.818181818 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0745996625583 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330212331255 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262567886522 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051960689395 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119938391579 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.