The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
The line chart depicts the comparison between manufacturing and utilization of energy in the United States from 1950 to 2000. It also estimates trend up to 2050.
Between 1950 and 1970, the rate of production, as well as consumption, surged by 30 units. However, then the exhaustion of energy was rose dramatically while the creation maintained a plateau by numerous ups and downs for 5 years. Moreover, till 2000 the difference between the production and consumption became wider, to be precise 25 units.
Moving further, there was a sudden increase in the depletion of energy from 2000 to 2012 by 20 units while the mass production slowly elevated by 10 units in the given interval of time. Later, it is predicted that trend will follow the same pattern in the next decades and rocketed by 20 units of manufacturing and 10 units of exhaustion.
All in all, the graph says that squandering and creation do not go hand in hand so imports are necessary to overcome this problem and to satisfy the needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-16 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84971098266 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77442196155 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2116882336 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187653320339 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713541065717 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395875320754 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982149122703 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497792546102 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.