" Money is wasted on space exploration as compared to basic needs of human". Give your views.
As the technology advances day by day, various innovations and inventions are takes place in the society. One of them is exploration of space. Exploration of space means to enquire about space, whether the life on space is possible or not, whether the necessities of life are available or not.This essay delves into both the views before coming to its own opinion.
Generally, the country who spends astronaumical on the exploration of space, then it is one of the main characteristic of developed country. This feature also helps in exchanging technologies in between the countries which helps in building cordial relations between the countries. All of this leads to generation of employment. To exemplify, in India, there is one space centre, named after Indian scientist, Satish Dhawan Space Centre. This centre is operated by Indian Space Research Organisation. In this contemporary epoch, it has two satellite launch pads. So, this is one of the biggest achievement of India.
On the flip side of coin. instead of spending huge funds on these kind of projects, Government should spend their funds on providing the basic amenities and facilities to its residents. It is also true that for being a developed country, Government must not waste its single penny on the extravagance activities. Rather it may provide food, cloth and house to the poor at the subsidised rates. Moreover, Government should spend its funds on roads, railways, education, infrastructure and so on. Spending Government funds on the projects like space exploration is a huge waste of money due to various reasons. One of them is if any satellite launch fails then all the money, time and efforts go in vain. Even, sometimes human resource also have to suffer.
From the arguments one can conclude that for the more development of the country, the projects like space exploration plays a crucial role. But, the Government should give its priority to the basic facilities and amenities of the public includes food, clothes and shelter.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below. 11
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ecessities of life are available or not.This essay delves into both the views before...
^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
... of India. On the flip side of coin. instead of spending huge funds on these kind of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...coin. instead of spending huge funds on these kind of projects, Government should spend th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e penny on the extravagance activities. Rather it may provide food, cloth and house to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15501519757 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87282445545 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562310030395 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7236576553 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157346607978 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457775568037 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498906870252 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954606540138 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179876366461 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.