Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The main topic of both passage and the lecture is to discuss the truth of Peary's claim which he reached to the north pole. The author argues that his claim is true based on some theory in support of this fact, while the lecturer, in contrast, not only refutes the author's claims but also states that there are not solid evidence to support this idea, on the number of accounts elaborated upon here under.
To commence with, both the writer and the speaker discuss the National Geographic Society committee to investigate this claim. The author asserts National Geographic Society concluded that Peary's accounts were consistent and persuasive. The professor contradicts this idea by asserting that even though the National Geographic Society investigates the truth of this claim but this was not completely objective; moreover, its members were the close friends of Peary which funded his trip to the north. In addition, this committee investigates and established for 2 days which they could not record carefully this issue.
Thus their decision was biased and untrustworthy.
In addition, both the reading and the lecturer discuss speed issue of the same trip as well as the Peary's trip. The author says that Tom Avery's trip declared the truth of this claim because that trip had the same condition. The Professor, on the other hand, states that Avery's trip condition was different in comparison with Peary's trip. Even though both of them use the same sled as the professor said Avery slid did not carry any food and food transfer with the airplane to him; moreover; the weather condition was different and this condition for Peary trip was unfavorable.
The last allegation of the author against which the professor asserts is that some photo could not prove this fact. The speaker argues that photograph could not support his claim. There are some techniques which investigate the photos precisely. The Peary's photo taken by a primitive fuzzy slightly camera and its photo could fade over time. Therefore, these photos are not suitable for obtaining the exact place of the sun. Finally, this claim was not precise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dentista1985 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jiyakavya | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which work is the best thing to do? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree: It’s more important for the government to spend money to build art museums and music performance centers than to build recreational facilities (such as swimming pool and playgrounds)? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is commonly believed that in life, success is not the most important thing; it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Which one do you prefer? students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...could not record carefully this issue. Thus their decision was biased and untrustwo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04558404558 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45982978577 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48433048433 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1060065292 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.176470588 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0080830976834 0.272083759551 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00345936450291 0.0996497079465 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00948025091085 0.0662205650399 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00373382933509 0.162205337803 2% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00457806396638 0.0443174109184 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.