Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extend do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

Not surprisingly, every single country has its private controlling systems and performs certain political as well as industrial actions. It is suggested that main priority of each country should be promoting upsurge in industry. This idea should be viewed and analyzed from multiple perspectives.

Undeniably, encouraging increase in production of materials and yielding more products has some long term benefits. Supplying needs of citizens and coping effectively with food shortage problems or certain types of insufficient products can be taken as an example. By accomplishing and reforming those policies, some countries have a potential to enjoy gargantuan income due to exporting those products worldwide.

On the other hand, increasing industry is not necessarily reasonable and beneficial action primarily because of some side effects associated with it. To begin with, some crucial areas notably education, public facilities and medicine will be ignored and inadequate sums of money will be invested. Thus, subsequent plunge standard of living will occur. Secondly of all, there are lots of significant issues required for the well–being of a country, namely current affairs, strengthening infrastructures and armies, rather than merely concentrating on increased production. Finally, severe shortage of natural recourses will ensue because of upsurge in production.

In the light of these facts outlined above, it cannot be acceptable to underestimate remaining fields like education public facilities and security, despite some contemporary benefits of increasing production. Quantity of production should be controlled and kept in balance predominantly in order to avoid some negative by-products in the long term.