As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Our entire world is shaped by modern technology.Everything that we use or implement has its roots in the technological progress made within the last 100 years.Technology has helped us to surpass the most daunting obstacles in our unrelenting thirst for knowledge.But at the same time I believe it has made us more dependent on our innovations. Emphatically speaking it has become the bane of the common man crippling his abilities to think and work by himself.Scientists and engineers have always strived to develop innovations which reduce the workload by automating tasks which previously had to be done by hand.I think automation has helped us by reduce the number of errors in the system and also increase the industrial output of a particular workstation. Also man has tried to automate the thinking process that goes into solving a problem by introducing new tools for solving mathematical and logistical problems. This I believe is the problem we are talking about and it is a considerable disadvantage conferred upon us by technology
Softwares for solving equations are just a few of the myriad of new improvements in technology within the last ten years. We have seen robots make their mark on the field of medical science and we now have apps to help us with most of our daily chores. Gadgets like cell phones tablets now assist us in finding locations and booking appointments even correcting emails to be sent to our colleagues. This hampers our natural instincts and we develop a blind dependence on technology. For instance while finding a particular location we use google earth or google maps. But these softwares may interfere with our previous knowledge about a particular locality and even overturn some previous ideas of short routes that we might have. Softwares for solving equations are another example. They solve sets of equations subject to certain boundary condiions without us having any idea of the solution procedures and the assumptions in the solution. These are examples of the progess made by technology to explore new frontiers but they reduce our scope for ingenuity. Technological advances have led to the automation of tasks which previously had to be done by hand. This has helped us surpass restrictions on the output of certain industrial and medical processes. Medical devices have greatly contributed to our increased lifespan and robot assisted surgery has alleviated our chances of success in critical operations.
Thus to conclude I believe that technology can be considered both a blessing and a curse. It depends on the perspective of the user and to what extent he is dependent on it. Some forms of technology are more useful than others while some technological devices are I believe consumer friendly and should be avoided to allow for self ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Everything
...re world is shaped by modern technology.Everything that we use or implement has its roots ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Technology
...progress made within the last 100 years.Technology has helped us to surpass the most daunt...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...in our unrelenting thirst for knowledge.But at the same time I believe it has made ...
^^^
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Scientists
... abilities to think and work by himself.Scientists and engineers have always strived to de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 615, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...which previously had to be done by hand.I think automation has helped us by reduc...
^
Line 1, column 762, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ial output of a particular workstation. Also man has tried to automate the thinking ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mails to be sent to our colleagues. This hampers our natural instincts and we dev...
^^
Line 2, column 1220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us surpass restrictions on the output of certain industrial and medical processes...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ces of success in critical operations. Thus to conclude I believe that technology c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10893246187 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08181466865 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520697167756 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.2900174387 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.277777778 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129975381472 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420849745624 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351838421337 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976663896742 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276611394088 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.5 11.8971910112 265% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.