Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the
younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions
In recent years, an increasing number of people are concerned about the phenomenon that fierce competition in the job market between the old and the young has become an increasingly widespread problem. Although there will be some negative consequences of this trend, several measures can be taken to address this potential problems.
There are several issues caused by the increasing competition in the job market between the old and young workers. One of these is age discrimination; the older are often put at a distinct disadvantage compare to the young counterpart when seeking the same position with young candidates even if they have similar abilities and qualifications. As a result, a large number of old people will be unemployed; hence, they will not have enough money to cover their basis needs. The second problem is that the older people are under pressure when the young people seem to be more creative and adapt to changes at the workplace easier than. This may lead to any physical and mental problem among the old such as stress and depression.
There are some effective solutions to address the job competition. Firstly, what business should do is to have a fixed quota of jobs set aside for people under a certain age and over a certain age. As a result, there will be more opportunities for both the old and the young to find suitable jobs and earn a living. Another measure would be for individual to advance their abilities and skills. The older workers should be willing to enhance their skills through attending training courses in computer literacy and try to adapt to changes in the working environment.
In conclusion, a range of measures can be used to mitigate the problems that possibly arise as the job competition between older people and young people is increasing.
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
- In some countries, a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers. Why has this happened? What are some effects? 67
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 56
- price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...lities and qualifications. As a result, a large number of old people will be unemployed; hence, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94719471947 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74697712062 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521452145215 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1729090936 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212033374793 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734251984981 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051512244483 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132626227199 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335242164019 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.