summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate several significant changes that occurred in Stokeford village between 1930 and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that while the number of houses rose dramatically, the lands for agricultural purposes disappeared during the period of 80 years.
In 1930, there were a few houses on both sides of the main road which ran through the middle of the village of Stokeford. However, in the year of 2010, roads were expanded and more houses were built along these roads. Moreover, the 2 area of farmlands in the north-east and south-west of the village gave away to residential areas. By 2010, shops had demolished and only the Post office remained.
The local primary school was extended with 2 new buildings in the center of Stokeford in 2010. In addition to, in the south-east of the village, the large house was expanded to become a retirement home for old generation between 1930 and 2010. Gardens were narrowed in order to widen the road and construct more houses over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-16 | pawan966@722 | 11 | view |
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 72
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What‘s your opinion? 56
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What arethe reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 43
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98224852071 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63888077553 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0395229704 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0114536227477 0.215688989381 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00496415782758 0.103423049105 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.014040758651 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00527709967059 0.15604864568 3% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00914020474607 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.