Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990
The bar chart compares expenditure by three income groups on three types of fast food in the UK in 1990.
Overall, while all three income groups bought fast foods, there were differences in the type of fast food eaten by each group. It is also clear that the low income group spent the lowest amount.
People in the high income group spent the most money. They spent about 42 pence per week on hamburgers, and 17 and 19 pence per week on fish and chips and pizza respectively. In the average income group, consumers also spent more on hamburgers than on the other fast foods. Their spending on burgers was 33 pence per week, although fish and chips came a close second at 25 pence. The lowest expenditure was just 12 pence on pizza.
People spent more on fish and chips than on burgers and pizza in the low income group. However, spending was relatively low, at just 17 pence per week on fish and chips, 14 pence on hamburgers and only 7 pence on pizza
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | meoconxinhxan | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44318181818 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17182251037 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7776888887 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216906442376 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105238087792 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125246327799 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187011566701 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155232625442 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.36 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.