Learn facts on the class room or on academic trip
Nowadays, there are lots of methods for teaching students such as academic travel or educating students by the Internet. In this way, some people would rather to learn the fact on the class room while others prefer to learn new things in the academic travel. From my point of view, learning in the class room would be better since that is a convenient plan and that is cost-effective in comparison with academic trip as well. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, is comfortable for students to learn their lessons in the class because in class they have lots of facilities such as blackboard or video projector. Actually, these devices can simplify learning process. However, in the academic trip you cannot access to the electricity or even you cannot have a blackboard. In addition, class room is like a shelter for graders. In other words, in the rainy days or a day that the weather is not clear you are not able to go to academic trip in order to learn about new lessons. As a result, class is the best place for learning.
Second, academic trip needs plenty of money but staying at school and try to learn lessons in the class room does not need more money. For instance, for the academic trip you should prepare expensive instruments such as warm clothes or even specific shoes because of the bad weather conditions but you certainly do not need these instruments for learning in the class room. Furthermore, for going to trip you need a vehicle therefore you should spend a lot of money in order to prepare a bus for the trip so students should get a lot of money from their parents for commuting service.
All in all, from what I have been discussed above, these days, we witness great deal of training methods that they help pupils so as to learn in the best way. Under this condition, some graders would like to learn their lessons in the academic trip but others like to learn in the class room. In my opinion, learning in the class would be beneficial for students because not only can they feel comfortable, but also they are able to save their money properly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-07 | nilav | 66 | view |
2023-04-18 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
2023-02-09 | Rasika0511 | 73 | view |
2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
- People would be happier if they had fewer possessions 39
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 81
- Introduce your abilities to others in order to have successful life 63
- Stay at one place or move around? 87
- Strict teacher or easy going teacher 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ly, these devices can simplify learning process. However, in the academic trip you cann...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... training methods that they help pupils so as to learn in the best way. Under this condi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63466666667 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44959715509 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1135597032 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 5.45110844103 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459261344376 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169579071762 0.076458572812 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121897787172 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319660052496 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618435945704 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.