Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does on really discover the value of that idea.
The statement claims that best way of an argument is its ability to persuade someone with opposing viewpoint and it documents with reasons that protect the idea from doubts and compromising the vision of other can find the value of that idea. Whenever people debate about controversial issue such as how to make a limit for the abortion, or do we have to abolish the law of execution of criminal? There are always have the positive attitude toward the argument while others have negative or maybe different vision of the argument. However, there are two attractive ideas that will affect the statement to disagree: opposing viewpoint can have vision, and the directionality of the argument is to consolidate each other value.
First of all, opposing vision can have vision. Most argument has always pros and cons, and there are so many types of argument. While someone agree with the argument, others don’t. However, just because opposing vision has different ideas, it doesn’t mean that they should be convinced. Opposing ideas are neither a negative or bad influence to the argument; it is basically, opposing vision will show the other aspects of vision; which doesn’t have to be convinced to other way. Hence, different vision should be accepted as itself.
Moreover, argument is for consolidation of each other’s value. In politics or international diplomacy, there are many types of adversities to persuade easily to other factions or other countries. People are colored by what they pursue, and any vision shouldn’t be disturbed. Take for instance, there are employer and employee; whereas employee have different opinion about their salary, employer don’t accept it. Then it came up with another conflict to other problems. Therefore, there should be a consolidation among different aspects of opinion.
Admittedly, persuasion should be required in argument. Defending an idea against the doubts can be a reason why to persuade the opposing viewpoint and contrasting the other viewpoint to discover the value of that idea. For example, argument of environmental problem is one of the major issue around the world. While developed countries agree about to reduce the amount of methane excretion, developing countries disagrees because this will cause their development in remission. They will try to convince each other; however, it essentially can’t taper each other. Therefore, there should be an understanding of each other situation so that they can compromise; this aspect of the issue is not easily solved, the argument should be someone has to step back and so that the others can step forward.
In conclusion, the general vision of the statement is that best test of an argument should have persuasion of the opposing vision. It is controversial issue because the key of argument can be persuasion. However, with those compelling reasons, it will buttress the idea that argument is not always persuasion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Pranjil | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | NRS | 58 | view |
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 66
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. 50
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people’s hearts or minds. 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company."Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different constructio 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...execution of criminal? There are always have the positive attitude toward the argume...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...o many types of argument. While someone agree with the argument, others don't. H...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
.... Opposing ideas are neither a negative or bad influence to the argument; it is ba...
^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'employees'?
Suggestion: employees
...ke for instance, there are employer and employee; whereas employee have different opinio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 803, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd so that the others can step forward. In conclusion, the general vision of the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3170212766 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87412789142 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440425531915 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.2191995674 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.96 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333447541324 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102189059201 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126451550419 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206146075067 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807181930988 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.