the chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999
The chart indicates the various levels of qualification for after school degree in Australia and the ratio of men and women who had them in 1991.
As you can see in the chart ratio of males were more than females in skilled vocational diploma , postgraduate diploma and masters’s degree. The proportion of men in skilled vocational diploma was 9 times more than women and was the most between all of them(90%).
The ratio of females were 2 times more than males in undergraduate diploma however, woman were half of men in postgraduate diploma. Females in skilled vocational diploma had the lowest ratio between all of the category. Females were a little more than males in bachelor’s degree.
Finally you can see difference between men and women in the lowest level and the highest one was a lot. Different gender had almost the same ratio in middle level of post-school qualification. We can notice that women interested to have bachelor’s degree in Australlia in 1999.
- today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold . to what extent do you agree or disagree ? 55
- creative artist should always be given freedom to express their own ideas (in words music or film ) in whichever way they wish . there should be no government restriction on what they do 70
- some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged . others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults . 40
- the chart below shows the different levels of post school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 53
- the map below is of the town of Garlsdon . A new supermarket(s) is planned for the town . The map shows tow passible sites for the supermarket. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant . 65
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 789 1000
No. of Different Words: 75 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.811 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.688 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.223 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.222 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.475 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.713 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.198 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4