" The table shows the figure for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980."
The diagram below helps to compare the figures for imprisonments in various countries between 1930 and 1980.
It is clearly visible from the table that there were great fluctuations and the height of figures has changed during the given period.The smallest amount of prisoners belongs to Great Britain which has grown from 30000 to 80000 between decades. Meanwhile, in Australia the level of imprisonment fluctate in different years and finally became the smallest index among five countries in 1980.
In 1930 the quantity of prisons was balanced in New Zealand and United States, but during the years this equality has changed. For instance, at last example the indicator of New Zealand decreases, but in United States the height of the figure became the greatest among the given countries in 1980.The amount of prisons in Canada was worrying in 1930 but during 51 years it decreased and became the second biggest indicator in 1980.
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 75
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 87
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 52
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 54
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out.It is pointless to try keep them alive. 70
Sentence: Meanwhile, in Australia the level of imprisonment fluctate in different years and finally became the smallest index among five countries in 1980.
Error: fluctate Suggestion: fluctuate
flaws:
Always put a space after punctuation marks. E-rater is sensitive.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 768 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.955 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.416 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.726 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.519 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.791 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4