" The table shows the figure for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980."
The diagram below helps to compare the figures for imprisonments in various countries between 1930 and 1980.
It is clearly visible from the table that there were great fluctuations and the height of figures has changed during the given period.The smallest amount of prisoners belongs to Great Britain which has grown from 30000 to 80000 between decades. Meanwhile, in Australia the level of imprisonment fluctate in different years and finally became the smallest index among five countries in 1980.
In 1930 the quantity of prisons was balanced in New Zealand and United States, but during the years this equality has changed. For instance, at last example the indicator of New Zealand decreases, but in United States the height of the figure became the greatest among the given countries in 1980.The amount of prisons in Canada was worrying in 1930 but during 51 years it decreased and became the second biggest indicator in 1980.
- The two maps below show an island before and after construction of some tourist facilities. summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant 80
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries 82
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and inustrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 80
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 75
- ”Prevention is better than cure”Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. 54
Sentence: Meanwhile, in Australia the level of imprisonment fluctate in different years and finally became the smallest index among five countries in 1980.
Error: fluctate Suggestion: fluctuate
flaws:
Always put a space after punctuation marks. E-rater is sensitive.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 768 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.955 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.416 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.726 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.519 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.791 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4