The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The graph illustrates the comparison of unemployment rates in two economically developed countries of the world - United States and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
In the US the percentage of workforce had significantly decreased during the given period, but we cannot see the similar pattern in Japan, in contrast the rates had considerably increased between that time.During the first half of the indicated period the difference between percentages was approximately 1.2%, to be more precise, in Japan percentages had risen to 4.3 %, meanwhile in the US after some fluctuations the index has diminished to 5.5 %.
On the other hand, during the rest of the period the difference was becoming less and between 1998-1999 the curves indicated the same percentage-5.1% which means that the unemployment rates became equal.
In conclusion, it can be noted that even though most years the unemployment levels of these countries had differed, the percentages have gone hand in hand since 1998.
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 60
- The table below gives information about population over 60 year old in six regions in 2000 and the predicted numbers of population over 60 in 2050 It also shows the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 83
- The table below shows energy used in 3 countries from 2000 2001 and the increase in usage since 1990 in percent 80
- The diagram below shows how the Japanese Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. Write a report for a university lecturer, describing the information shown below. 80
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 817 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.171 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.99 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.888 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.556 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.193 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4