In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
Agree or disagree
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In this age of television or digital world, people generally think that reading book is not much important now as everything can be learnt by watching television.
This is true that everything can be learnt from television easily and in less time as we can have visualization of the things that we are learning about. But the point is that although one knows all the facts about any particular subject, if someone asks him to explain about it, he can never do it unless he has had ever read about the same in some book. And to bear a good personality or to represent oneself in a group or to acquire leadership skill, one must have the ability to explain the things that he knows. If one knows everything about something but cannot explain, it is worth not knowing about it.
Books have many advantages like, they contain complete theories and definitions and descriptions. We can say that only book contains real knowledge. One may not say that learning from television is not worthy either. It has its own advantages. By watching audio-visual depictions of several scientific and sociological topics and there simulations, discussions and detailed documentaries, we can have a better feel of the subject we are learning about. Moreover, it saves time by learning through the digital media.
Keeping all those points in mind I disagree to the above given statement. For learning something reading books is essential and must and television is just a supplement. Hence, for the modern world, traditional learning through book reading and writing is much better than incorporating knowledge through the digital media in general and television in particular. It has been proven through research and facts that learning through television is effective only when there is a fair amount of theoretical and book based knowledge. Therefore, it only expedites the process of understanding a subject but does not replace proper, regular, regimented and methodical reading of the academic curricula.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-08-23 | akshaya deep singhal | 64 | view |
- Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence Talent will not nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent Genius will not unrewarded genius is almost a proverb Education will not the world is full of educated derelicts Persistence an 72
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible, other want to live along their parents as long as they can. Discuss what will you choose 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals. "In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of Nadasept killed 40 percent more bacteria than the liquid hand soaps currently used in o 20
- “Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persis 48
- People do many things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? 90
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 327 350
No. of Characters: 1630 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.252 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.985 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.818 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.438 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.643 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5