The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming.
To what extent do you agree?
Undoubtedly environmental problems have become the most thread to the survival of the humanity. There is a controversial debate that heads of the states should decrease the budget that are allocated to the local environment issues and instead increase the fund with respect to vital issues like global warming, deforestation, and etc. To me, this idea is appealing in the view of the fact that these events would gradually not only contribute to vanishing of the lands, but it would result in severe air pollution.
On the one hand, global warming is one of the important issues that would have detrimental effect on the disappearance of the islands and shores throughout the globe. Reportedly, the temperature of the earth is increasing annually by 1 degree of the Celsius. So, this phenomenon would contribute to melting of the ice caps of the south and north poles. Hence, the increase in the level of the sea and oceans may cause flood throughout the world and also disappearance of the lands. For example according to the latest survey of the Michigan university, in the next ten years, sixty percent of the island of the japan will drown. This catastrophic issue is mainly caused by toxic emission of the old cars in the large cities. The old vehicles produce large amount of the carbon dioxide that is one of the immense causes of this increase in the temperature. Therefore, government should take action immediately with respect to this issue. Accordingly, they should do something regarding the replacing old cars with new ones and urge the car owner to have regular check up.
On the other hand, when it comes to air pollution, there are a lot of factors that lead to acceleration of this phenomenon. One of the most mainspring factor that always is neglected by people is deforestation. Reportedly, trees absorb carbon dioxide in the air and produce oxygen that we all breathe. These days, people tend to live in urban area. Hence, they sacrifice the forest in order to build new high rising building and roads. For example, thirty percent of the forest in the north of Iran is disappearing in the light of the fact that people spread their cities across the jungles. So, it would be wise if government confined people not to abuse nature in order to build these infrastructures. Similarly, they can re-cultivate some areas, people have exploited.
To sum up, in my personal view, the most urgent issues like global warming and deforestation shouldn’t be underestimated. It is believed that government of the countries should consider more financial support to handling these most threatening events. Not only would it result in creating the superior earth to live, but also it would guarantee the next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-02 | nottahta | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | oyondev007 | 92 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 51
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 95
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ues like global warming, deforestation, and etc. To me, this idea is appealing in the vi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, for example, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99344978166 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84390553095 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513100436681 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5404882917 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4347826087 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148801178471 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366466936332 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514236590742 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970884825206 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593814807828 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.