The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The line graph compares the proportion of tourists visiting four different types of Brighton attractions in England over a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
It is clear that the percentage of visitors to the Pavilion and the Pier both increased, while there was a noticeable decrease in the figures for the Art Gallery and the Festival over the period shown.
In 1980, the proportion of tourists visiting the Festival was highest, at around 30%, whereas the figure for the Pier was remarkably lower, at only 10%. Meanwhile, about 24% visitors who went to the Pavilion compared to roughly 22% to the Pier. In 1985, the percentage of visitors to the Art Gallery went up dramatically to a peak of approximately 38%. Likewise, the figure for the Pavilion and the Pier were slight increases, at 28% and 15% respectively. By contrast, the proportion of tourists who visited the Festival slightly went down.
Between 1985 and 1995, the percentage of visitors to the Pavilion rose significantly to approximately 50% and became the highest figure in the line graph. After 1995, although this figure decreased to about 30% in 2010, it was above the starting figure of the period. The proportion of tourists to the Art Gallery declined considerably to below 10% in 2010. At the same time, the figure for the Pier saw a small rise to just over 20%. Tourists who visited the Festival experienced a slight fall to roughly 28% in 2000 and remained at this level for the rest of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79296875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72101367238 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46484375 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7070800013 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232186558204 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910382143739 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108373302195 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172458935086 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141532501301 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.