The chart below show the average wages over of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003.
The graph provides information on the average salaries per week of the company TRN’s manager and general staff. In addition, the line graph depicts TRN’s financial gain from 2000 to 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that from 2000 to 2003 the salary of those in managerial position are higher in comparison to the general employees and TRN’s profit has significantly increased from the said time period. The trend also shows that with the rise in the company’s sales, the salary of the employees increase.
In 2000, the manager’s salary is almost twice higher than that of the general staff with approximately $1,400 and $700 respectively. Similarly, in 2001, the same trend is shown with only a minimal rise in 2002. Managers average wage per week rocketed to almost $1,800 while the regular employees remained just below $1,000 margin. In the year 2003, the manager’s salary continuously rose reaching roughly $1,900 while the staff consistently remained at $800.
TRN’s financial gain started at $2 million in 2000 and has gradually increased in between 2000-2001. The profit has declined and fell back again at $2 million by the year 2001. After that year, the company’s profit has dramatically increased over the following years reaching approximately $4.5 million in 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-20 | stellaronduty | 84 | view |
- More and more prisons are being built to house the world s criminals and many people believe long term imprisonment is the answer to solving the crime problem However others feel that psychological assistance is what is required Discuss both views and giv 80
- Economic growth and development are usually considered to be beneficial both for individuals and for society as a whole What are some advantages and disadvantages of economic development 78
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think that this is a positive or negative development 52
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 82
- The chart below show the average wages over of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of the general staff with approximately ,400 and 00 respectively. Similarly, in 2...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...average wage per week rocketed to almost ,800 while the regular employees remained...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he regular employees remained just below ,000 margin. In the year 2003, the manage...
^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...alary continuously rose reaching roughly ,900 while the staff consistently remaine...
^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... TRN's financial gain started at million in 2000 and has gradually increa...
^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... TRN's financial gain started at million in 2000 and has gradually increased in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ofit has declined and fell back again at million by the year 2001. After that yea...
^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...it has declined and fell back again at million by the year 2001. After that year, the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35436893204 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95371097453 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9044034599 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.272727273 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318053814676 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115163175705 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604008049707 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188694466514 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354589418942 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.