Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence in that society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The gun ownership of policemen is a controversial problem among community because some people argue that it may lead to the increase of violence in the society. Although the violence could be emerged in some cases, I believe that policemen should be equipped guns to protecting citizens and themselves as well.
The first reason I support the gun ownership of police force is that the gun is essential for a policeman to handle with criminals in emergency situations. Some criminals who are so dangerous, strong and difficult to handle will trouble the policemen when they are doing their mission. Moreover, the gun given to the policemen is restricted usage, which is used just for specific situations and the policemen have to take responsibility for this property. Thus, the violence is not likely to occur when the police force follow the regulations of gun utilization.
Secondly, a policeman bringing a gun by his side might act as a warning for criminals not to do bad actions. Therefore, the violence and crime would reduce. In fact, if a criminal observes that a police has no weapon which can prevent him from committing crime, he will have motivation to do it. For instance, a robber is going to rob people on the street, he might stop his criminal thought if he is afraid of a policeman carrying gun can shoot him from a far distance.
To sum up, although it may be true that the policeman with a gun will cause violence if the gun is not used properly, I strongly support the gun ownership of police force. The gun would be necessary for the police force to protect themselves and the civilians.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-20 | theresa_trangnguyen | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn the factsUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
- The crime rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many countries Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggest solutions 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'protecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: protecting
...would be necessary for the police force to protect themselves and the civilians.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76614924266 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503571428571 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3113774724 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150867236592 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633903243036 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239626479002 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971477544236 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238885708016 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.