The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the figures of immigration, emigration, and net in the UK over a period of 9 years.

It is clear that immigration rate was significantly higher than the others and these all figures had considerable variations.

In 1999, about 450 thousand people came to live in the United Kingdom and this number continued to increase in the following stages, whereas the number of net had a slightly fall from about 170 thousand in 1999 to 150 thousand in 2003. In 1990 - 2001 period, the figure of people who came out to like in the UK decreased minimally, however, in the next stage, it rapidly rose, at about 460 thousand in 2002.

The number of people came to live in Uk peaked at around 580 thousand in 2004 and the figure of the UK emigration reached the highest point at approximately 420 thousand at the end of the period. Generally, both immigration and emigration rates basically rose, despite some fluctuations while the figure of net experienced a downward trend, fell by about 100 thousand from 2004 to 2008.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 Noah1997 56 view
2020-01-07 pateldhruv1708 61 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 89 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 67 view
2019-12-07 MHT 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user hanhngan_vt :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...g stages, whereas the number of net had a slightly fall from about 170 thousand in 1999 to 150 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79888268156 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79025530935 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7813379827 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0513042233317 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272102247429 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0136754767594 0.0843802449381 16% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0302201277617 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175840047618 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.