Some people think that shops should not allowed to sell food and drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health. Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that only food and beverage that are proven scientifically good for health allow to be available in marketplace. In my opinion, I agree with this point of view for the following reasons.
One possible justification for this could be that consumers in the present day have been unindated with various kind of food and drinks, which could make their purchasing decisions less wisely, unless there are restricted instruments on these items such as via expert's advice. It is definitely the case that these foodstuff and beverage comprise of both wholesome and unhealthy food and drinks sources, which are seldom distinguished, especially with ordinary people who have less knowledge of them. To illustrate, Vietnamese inhabitants have been encountering a variety of food and drinks in shops on a daily basis, including those are good and bad for human's health, particularly Chinese food which contain the large amount of food addictive and colouring. With naked eyes, consumers virtually cannot recognize whether their desirable items are genuine and easily pick up those products that could do harm to their health if donot have any warns from experts.
Another probable reason why I advocate with those who maintain that only scientifically proved good products could be sold is that more and more consumers have been facing health deteriotation due to the detrimental effects of consuming not wholesome food such as junk food and fast food. The prime example of this could be that cancer rate are increasing dramatically in recent decades, notably stomach cancer, which could attribute to excessive consumption of poor quality food that are infected by pesticide and chemical fertilizer. As a result, if these bad-for-health items could be differentiated from diverse sources by experts and scientists, then it is more likely that humankind could at least call a halt to this cancer "epidemic" and other potentially fatal diseases.
In conclusion, I would support those believe that only food and drinks which are proven good for health by scientists and experts could be sold in shops.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-29 | kingnight153 | 31 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 52
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different ages from 1973 to 2008 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they gotmarried in oneparticularcountry in1996 and2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this foodstuff' or 'these foodstuffs'?
Suggestion: this foodstuff; these foodstuffs
... advice. It is definitely the case that these foodstuff and beverage comprise of both wholesome...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
... case that these foodstuff and beverage comprise of both wholesome and unhealthy food and d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hose are good and bad for humans health, particularly Chinese food which contain ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, at least, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28783382789 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94033690255 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551928783383 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2812009405 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.2 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25254841234 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112496292909 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06639416322 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175971209985 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364323228049 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.