TPO 20
In the reading passage, the author claims that "let it burn" policy, which allows forest fires continue burning without human interfiering to extinguish it, render the environment damaged() by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts dount on what is presented in the text and states that "let it burn" rule is not always destructive, but it is constructive many times which demonstrated that indeed it is a good regulation.
At first, the author argues that deminishing the vegentation is one of the first adverse ramificatin of this policy. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that scroching has created the suitable environment for other plants to colonize in that place. Actually, diversification in plants occurs after each fire since other speacies take this opportunity to grow. For instance, having found more unshaded space, the small plants can grow well. In addition, take the Yellowstone fire as an example. There were a lot of seeds that require heat to germenate. Hence,() if this fire would not happen, the seeds could not have germinate.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that wildlife undergone a sever decline in various animal speices. On the other hand, the professor disputes this point by clarifying that as of clonizing() the small plant, a lot of small animals such as rabit and hair are tempting to live there. Subsequently, the predators of them will attract to the new environment. As a matter of fact, they produce a new life cycle and food chain which is undoubtedly far stronger than it was before the fire.
Finally, the author assert that the presence of fire in such location, which its economy is closely dependent to the tourists, can end up with a substantial drop in the number of visitors. The professor, thought, dismisses this idea by subscibing to the point that this will happen if the fire repeated frequently, but the Yellowstone fire has not happened after the1988. Besides, so various is the factors which lead to a decrease in tourism rate that it is less possible to combine with each other and cause this economy disaster. Thus, people come back again after that fire regularly and promote the tourism indistry in that region.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 70
- Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while others think being away from people we care about can 70
- Imagine that you have received some land to use as you wish. How would you use this land? Use specific details to explain your answer. 70
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 85
- TPO 40 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'germinated'.
Suggestion: germinated
...ld not happen, the seeds could not have germinate. In addition, the reading passage hold...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 378.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07671957672 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76114065329 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 145.348785872 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57671957672 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2451899171 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.882352941 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231881334241 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670370083178 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04083334887 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128411013427 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263564044989 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 63.6247240618 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.