The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children's sports between 2008 and 2014. the second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period.
The line graphs illustrate how much money was spent on children's sports by British parents and how many children who participated in 3 categories of sports, namely football, athletics and swimming in Britain over the course of 6 years, starting in 2008.
Looking at the graphs, it is immediately obvious that the amount of money spent on children's sports experienced an upward trend. In addition, football was most popular sport for children in Britain over the period from 2008 through 2014.
As can be seen from the given graphs, the money spent by British parents on their children's sports at the beginning of the period shown stood at 20 pounds. This figure increased dramatically to 32 pounds in 2014.
It is also worth noting that the number of children who participated in football was 7.5 million in 2008. This figure rose slightly to 9 million in 2014. A similar trend was witnessed in swimming participation. The children participated in swimming climbed from 2 million to 3 million over the period 2008 through 2014. There was a considerable increase in the number of children participated in athletics from 0.5 million to 5 million over the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-23 | chenxiaoyan | 84 | view |
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 84
- Describe a pet you have 79
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion to 5 million over the same period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77942307468 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.5153023116 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375973144009 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152665790911 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916630412193 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243432284594 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384171309169 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.