Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should
encourage their children do their work independently.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which so critical are the role of parents that they constitute the foundations of the children's personality. Therefore, it is not far-fetched to presume that the parent's manner regarding the kids' school work can be accounted as the most influential factor which makes up their character. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that parents should inspire their kids to study autonomously rather than assisting them with their home works. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the children's habitats turn to their future behaviors. There is no denying the fact that habituation is a basis of most of the human's activities. It means that when a particular action is repeated frequently, individuals react to it unconsciously. According to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highly respected professor in the Department of at the University of Macquarie, more that 80% of the people's conduct toward specific circumstances or stimuli are originated from their experience in the first decade of their lives. This probe provides further legitimacy of this idea that parents should flourish the features in their kids that bring the most beneficial personality for them. Subsequently, having led them in their assignments, parents teach their children to become independent and undoubtedly this trait will last forever with their child. While if they constantly get involved in their lessons, their children will be the dependent and weak-kneed people who are always seeking to get help from others.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideration is that the parenting is far beyond the mere companionship with the children in every single second of their lives. Needless to say that it is an absolute necessity for a happy family that all the family members allocate sufficient time for their favorite action, aside from their duties. Admittedly, parents always engaging in their kids' activities have no time for themselves. Take a mother that had been taught her kid to undertake the accountability of the assignments by her own and just comes to require a favor when she encounters a serious problem. It comes as no surprise that this type of upbringing not only augments the children's capability but also allows the parents to have sufficient time for themselves with the aim of spending more efficient time together.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that persuade the kids to take the responsibilities of school assignments is the best approach. Regardless of the independence of the individuals in their future lives, parents find an opportunity to pass their time in a favorable way.
- TPO 1 - Intergrated:4 days working instead of 5 day 85
- Has technology made the world a better place to live? 76
- TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait 80
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents shouldencourage their children do their work independently. 90
- Has technology made the world a better place to live? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
... is not far-fetched to presume that the parents manner regarding the kids school work c...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a favorable way" with adverb for "favorable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... find an opportunity to pass their time in a favorable way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2384.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16017316017 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94244624721 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536796536797 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6208192381 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.444444444 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345776889837 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114009576876 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887702064824 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216174446728 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635001960524 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.