: Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of technology have dragged on the large number of digital communication methods such as computers, mobile phones were produced. People often use those to connect with others. However, I believe that the growth use of digital communication has had a negative effect on ability to read and write of young people.
The primary reason is starting at its convenience and speed. People usually use the informal language in communication via computers and moblie phones. For example, they will use “u” instead of “you”, “HPB” replaced to “happy birth day”. Besides, mobile operators have capped the length of text messages to 160 characters because its content are often short and contain spoken expression. On the contrary, writing skills’s requirement is making full sentences with fomal language. Children will can not write an comprehensive essay whose content is describing a beautiful scenery or expressing their fellings about something. Spending too much time on digital communication methods will cause the lacking of ability to write.
Another negative effect of using computers and mobile phones to connect with others were that capping the reading skills. Of phones and computers, there are automatic spell-check tools when you type a message. If this process are repeated, the user will be depend on it. Their grammar and lexical range may gradually erode. In addition, communicating via computers and mobile phones make young people short of confident when spelling. Furthermore, there are various information in the Internet which people use digital communication methods can read. They will not know how to select it to read. The impact of disoder information, one of disavantages caused by digital communication methods, is very incisive to our reading skills.
To sum up, we can not negate advantages which electronic devices gave; however, people should have controlled the time spending on it. If not, our ability to read and write will be seriously affected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-19 | tramhuynh123 | 95 | view |
| 2017-05-18 | tramhuynh123 | 61 | view |
| 2017-05-18 | tramhuynh123 | 61 | view |
| 2015-04-09 | mayoiko | 80 | view |
- Comparison of car theft 67
- In many cities crime is increasing Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce crime levels 83
- Task 2 As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 54
- money spent on books in 4 countries 73
- the charts below show the percentage of the food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sitdown restaurants. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...l language. Children will can not write an comprehensive essay whose content is de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51437699681 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01339441278 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591054313099 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8876410782 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361054244679 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980387804728 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823481508708 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217136052396 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074518728024 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.