The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These particular two maps represent how an island constructed for tourism with a few facilities.
Turning to the first map before construction, it can be seen that an island, which surrounded by sea, had a few palm trees and a beach in the west.
Moving to the other map, one can see that there are some facilities have been built on the island. One of the first things to note is that there are 15 tents for tourists to live in. The first six of them have been built around three palm trees on the west of the island while the others have been constructed on the central part of it. Between these tents, there is a restaurant in the north and a reception unit which is surrounded by a vehicle track.
Another thing which stands out from the map is that anyone who wants to go sailing should follow the vehicle track which brings to the pier in the southern side of the island. Also, there is a beach for swimming which can be found on the western part of the island.
Overall, after the construction, the island has become an amazing place to rest.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 78
- The following appeared as part of an article in the travel section of a newspaper:“Over the past decade, the restaurant industry in the country of Spiessa has experienced unprecedented growth. Thissurge can be expected to continue in the coming years, f 66
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, another thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41836734694 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31870775742 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7338688951 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177583839334 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784483879141 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603820067606 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115280110357 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527948907168 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.