People should stop giving to charities because they don’t know where their money ends up

Essay topics:

People should stop giving to charities because they don’t know where their money ends up

Nowadays, many people want to contribute something in the form of charities for homeless people. People started to contribute in many form money, clothes and medical treatment, but things are changing now they don’t have any idea where their contributions end up. Thus, we discuss in this essay, should they stop giving the charities.
Firstly, charities are the one of the things needed in now society because there are many people they have to anything to eat or to wear. Government should take some steps towards it to make developed country they are bound to see on this matter. Government have to makes some rules regarding this they have to take a measure where the money is going and how much money is coming in the charities and they are using it or not. Thus, company we make a balance sheet about this and people have all the information about the charities. People should start giving the charity it will help society and people.
The second reasons are many people wants to frauds and they keep the money by itself and show that the money is invested in right ways. There are many frauds in and out of the system those want to take all the money. The Government should make some rules and punishment about this if anyone have done this. Thus, this we help them to do their work in a proper way. Therefore, we should force the government to do this it will help people and the charities funds will invest in proper way
In the conclusion, people should not stop giving charities because it will help many people. They should ask government to take some actions towards it. I

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-06-09 ankur_21 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...bound to see on this matter. Government have to makes some rules regarding this they...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...les and punishment about this if anyone have done this. Thus, this we help them to d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hus, this we help them to do their work in a proper way. Therefore, we should force the governm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 5.60731707317 571% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 283.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63957597173 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28471941683 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452296819788 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1253755466 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7857142857 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377224944937 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131283563253 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822385688648 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262970833231 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805184757602 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.