The line graph illustrates the changes in the price of three different food product groups in the USA from 1979 to 2009 and the overall trend of consumer-price index over this 30-year period.
The line graph illustrates the changes in the price of three different food product groups in the USA from 1979 to 2009 and the overall trend of consumer-price index over this 30-year period.
It is clear from the line graph that there was upward trends in both three food product groups' prices and the CPI. Additionally, the cost of fresh fruits and vegetables experienced the most noticable change.
In 1979, the costs of three food groups and the CPI were almost the same, around 60. In contrast, there was a slight fluctuation in the price for fresh fruits and vegetables between 1979 and 1985, before increasing dramatically in the next 24 years. It reached the peak at around 330 in 2008 and gently dropped by 10 in the year following.
Over the same period, the CPI rose steadily from about 60 in 1979 to above 200 in 2009. The prices for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks followed a same upward pattern, with growing to 200 and 150 in 2009, respectively. Although their prices also rose, they were consistently below the consumer average after 1987.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-20 | linhyhun1294 | 78 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectorsin Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The line graph illustrates the changes in the price of three different food product groups in the USA from 1979 to 2009 and the overall trend of consumer-price index over this 30-year period. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79459459459 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51104208634 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4867640469 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563706831083 0.215688989381 261% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215753656265 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.294546503916 0.0843802449381 349% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.395177852231 0.15604864568 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.352020086838 0.0819641961636 429% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.