The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
A glance at the graph provided reveals the percentage of the tourists visited certain attrations in Brighton, England between 1980 ad 2010.
It is evident that while the numbers of visitors came to festival and art gallery decreased, there was upward trens in the figures for pavillon and pier. Additionally, the percentage of people visited art gallery experienced the most notable change.
In 1980, the percentage of tourists visiting pavillon was 23% then dramatically increased to around 50%, which was the highest figure in 1995. However, in the next 15 years it gradually fell and stood at 31% in 2010, slightly higher than festival. Visitors to the pier fluctuated from 1980 to 2010 then increased by 2% in 2010.
In 1980, the most popular Brighton attraction for visitors was festival, attracting 30% of the tourists. After that, the number of those attending festival decreased marginallyto 28% in 2010. In 1980-1985 period, the figure for Art gallery increased significantly to around 38% which was its highest point during the search period before falling substantially to under 10% in 2010. It was, therefore, the least popular attraction at the end of the search period.
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectorsin Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The line graph illustrates the changes in the price of three different food product groups in the USA from 1979 to 2009 and the overall trend of consumer-price index over this 30-year period. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the tourists. After that, the number of those attending festival decreased margi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18229166667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77884473866 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8189603521 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151583879363 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679280980034 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870570013246 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117428755531 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938604283324 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.