The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city center changed after improvements were made to the transport network, and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows how long it took to travel around a city before and after transport network was improved. The bar graph shows how much it costs to use different forms of transport in the city.
The cheapest form of transport is the bus, at € 0.40 per kilometer. However, it is also the slowest, even after improvements. Average journey times were 28 minutes before improvements, and 23 minutes after. The tram is slightly more expensive, at € 0.50 per kilometer. However, it is faster than the bus. Average journey times were reduced from 22 to 16 minutes.
The most expensive way of getting around the city is by taxi. However, it remains the fastest form of transport. Even after improvements to the system, a taxi ride only takes about 12 minutes. Car drivers have seen the biggest increase in journey times, from 10 to 15 minutes.
Overall, journey by bus and tram are still slower than by car or taxi, but they are more economical.
- In recent years, people watch more movies from overseas? What are the reasons for this? Should the government give financial support to local cinema to produce local films? 80
- Mobile phone owner growth 58
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant REWRITE 93
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 60
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.814 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 742 1000
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.524 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.359 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.814 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.308 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.361 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.574 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4