which one is better for students during breaks? taking different courses or doing voluntarily work to improving the aspects of life in city's universities.
The question is whether during break semester, students should take different courses aside from their major field or being volunteer in improving some aspects of life in city's universities. Everyone in consideration to his private view point can choose a specific point; however, I am inclined to affirm that taking diverse courses can lead students toward new perspectives of education and even more in such a great condition will provide some merits for their future. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my point of view:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that breaks have usually been planned to remove the lethargy and fatigue feeling which have overcome the young during a heavy semester; consequently, one should not forget that the main goal of breaks is that students spend their time for exciting and happy experiences. It goes without saying that different courses can challenge youths' abilities; hence, experiencing a new thing will cause students' brain to secrete Dopamine- it is a neural messenger-. Some experts often contend that this chemical substance is able to increase pleasure and joyful and meanwhile it is responsible for creating motivation. Briefly, a variety of unrelated courses with major filed can assist students to avoid any stress and anxiety in daily life.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact of interdisciplinary. Nowadays, the societies are competing with each other for achieving prosperity. Admittedly, one should notice that such a technology-driven world requires communities to have a high level of scientific knowledge. Traditionally, companies used to hire an employee with a specific skill; however, todays' those companies would rather take merging several fields into account. To elucidate, take my own experience, my major field is software engineering. One summer, I participated in an excavation trip and I could learn how to excavate in an ancient site or how to behave with the old discovered materials from underground. After returning, in fall semester, a new and appealing idea came to my mind, so I could write a computer code about determining approximate date of ancient stuff into original site without waiting for results of archaeology laboratory.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that the advantages of different course outweigh to its disadvantages and besides of providing happiness and experiencing new things, these types of courses can help students to suggest creative ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-03 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
- TPO35 3
- do you agree or disagree?visiting museum is the best way to get information about a country . 81
- Tpo19 69
- do you agree or disagree?it is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are young than old. 76
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, briefly, consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, while, i feel, of course, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32835820896 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96638010135 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.9692994472 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259565793009 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790997467189 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859892058655 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150810271823 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748022934769 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.