The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the different kinds of films screened in the UK and Australia in the year 2001, while the line graph demonstrates the changes of the UK and Australian cinema admissions from 1976 to 2006.
Overall, as can be seen, the bar graph shows that in both countries, most of the films screened came from the US in 2001. Another visible trend is that the line chart describes the trend of UK admission was higher than Australian admission all the time surveyed.
According to the line graph, in both Australia and the UK, the percentages of Australian film were lowest, with only around 2% and 10% respectively in 2001. The proportion of UK film screened in Australia was about 6%. The figure for this type of film screened in the UK was higher, at over 20%. Approximately 67% of US film, which screened in Australia, compared to almost 77% of this category of film screening in the UK.
According to the bar chart, the UK admission in 1976 was over 100 million after the UK witnessed a sharp decrease in the year 1985 with over 50 million. Likewise, the period from 1975 to 1985 saw a stable remain in Australian admission, at around from 20 million to 40 million. In just 20 years from 1985 to 2005, the UK and Australian cinema entering tended to increase gradually, at under 160 million and over 80 million respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-11 | saeed2751366 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 78
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 73
- Some people believe that when designing a building the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the line chart describes the trend of UK admission was higher than Australian ...
^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gher, at over 20%. Approximately 67% of US film, which screened in Australia, co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65975103734 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67955997618 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489626556017 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5349301111 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394744535755 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168324618577 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112574228379 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272308137233 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121607799585 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.