TPO 20
The author believes that the so-called "let it burn" policy, whereby fire in the environment is left unintervened by human, has negative effects on the environment, and it should be replaced by other policies. The lecturer, however, has the opposite point of view. She explains why the author is not right about his points.
First, the author states that the Yellowstone fire incident destroyed a significant part of the trees and vegitation in the park, and turned a precious national property into a wasteland. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts that destroying the old vegitation provided an oppontunity for a diversity of new plants to disperse in the area, which otherwise would not grow.
Second, the author suggests that the incident also caused a dramatic decrease in animal populations, as though many species either fled or died. Conversly, the lecturer argues that a lot of new species started to thrive in the area as a result of the ecological changes.
Finally, the author contends that the incident not only reduced the tourist season, but also caused a decline in the number of tourist visitors, which affected the economy in a negatively. On the other hand, the lecturer explains that it was an unsual incident, and the tourism regained its previous state a year after the incident, thus, the author might not be right about the effects of the incident on the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06896551724 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73067744096 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564655172414 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6381699453 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160695925205 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058221278904 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487850819509 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897968347277 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320416042159 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.