Children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able.
We are born into complex and demanding world, so it is necessary to be prepared for the responsibilities and obligations of life from childhood to adulthood. From my perspective, one way to prepare children for future is to assign household tasks to them. I will elaborate on the reasons which my view is based on in the following essay.
First of all, children need to learn about responsibilities. By including children in household chores, not only do parents acknowledge the children’s abilities, but also they teach them about discipline and importance of responsibilities. For example, when I was little, I had to make breakfast for the entire family; so I got used to getting up early in the morning even at weekends. Doing such routine tasks as a child made me a more independent and self-confident person.
Secondly, household tasks help children develop their social skills. For instance, when a child sets table for a dinner party he/she learns about how to create a pleasing dining environment as well as how to entertain the guests. Such experiences are considered an important part in socialization process in which social and cultural norms are passed on to future generation.
In conclusion, participating in household duties is of great benefit for children. I strongly believe that by assigning household tasks to children, we can raise them to be more responsible and well-behaved.
- sea otters 81
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? 70
- Grades encourage students to learn 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- TPO 44 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1977.66487455 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 229.0 407.700716846 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1615720524 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30100389052 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637554585153 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 618.680645161 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5420837702 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208426408953 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839347790641 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826067724375 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132718709678 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490451324584 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.