The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate five reasons for people cycling and five reasons for driving to work.
Overall, as can be seen, people who choose to go to work by bicycle because of health and fitness and less pollution account for the highest proportion of 5 categories. Another visible trend is that citizens who prefer to travel by cars have an equal percentage for two reasons, including its speed and it can carry things to work.
In terms of some causes of riding to work, the proportion who prefers cycling because it is better for health and less pollution than going by cars was 30%. The figures for those who seem to be that this is due to they do not suffer from parking problems, costs, and being faster than driving were lower, at 15%, 13% and 12% respectively.
According to the causes of commuting to work by cars, the largest percentage of people choosing the cars as it is more comfortable, with 40%. 21% of people say that they go to work by cars because of their distances to work, in comparison with 14% of those who drive because it is faster than cycling and need to carry things to work. The least important reason for travelling by cars is safer than going by bicycle.
- Many parents these days work in other countries taking their families with them Do you think advantages of the development outweigh its disadvantages 49
- Some people believe that when designing a building the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 76
- A rise in the standard of living in a country seems to only benefits cities rather than rural areas What problems might this difference cause How might the problems be reduced 89
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iving to work. Overall, as can be seen, people who choose to go to work by bicyc...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...s, costs, and being faster than driving were lower, at 15%, 13% and 12% respectively...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54418604651 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38575182912 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1935394256 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172792032046 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903196149718 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457087278704 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119537397819 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582033945443 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.