Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
transformed the whole world. While some people opine that early technological developments have far more beneficial effects on people’s life than the recent ones, I completely disagree with this point of view, because both of those have equal significant impact on our lives.
On the one hand, many early technological devices helped people and changed the way we live. The invention of printing, for example, had a profound impact on the way we impart knowledge to the next generation. The printing press allowed books and newsletters to be mass-produced, which meant that more individuals can gain access to these information sources. The telephone was another early scientific breakthrough that revolutionized and facilitated current methods of communication. From this, people to interact with each other in a far-flung place regardless of the geographical barrier. Finally, techno…led to new forms of transport, such as cars, trains and planes, which have completely … and trade goods.
On the other hand, I contend that recently cutting-edge technology also ushers merits to our life. Firstly, the presence of computer and the Internet enables individuals to shop online a wide range of applications, which makes human life definitely more convenient. With only a click of the mouse, it is possible to purchase merchandise such as clothes and daily necessities without even leaving our comfortable home. In addition, as to space technology, the advent of space shuttles assists astronauts in carrying out space exploration programmes, which can broaden human’s horizons about not only terrestrial planets but also extraterrestrial lives on earth, such as supernovas or black holes.
In conclusion, while people can reap a variety of powerful effects from the early technological advancements, I do not believe that they can totally outweigh the recent ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-12 | lauranguyen | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | gaurav2492 | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-13 | lauranguyen | 79 | view |
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 67
- Nowadays, researching on animal is ubiquitous. While some people says that it brings many benefits for both humans and animals, so we need make the best of it, the opponents disagree with this idea and argue that it is very cruel. Discuss both view and gi 89
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What form do these problems take? Do you think they outweigh its benefits? 84
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people tend to take temporary jobs for they have the time to do other things Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Transformed
transformed the whole world. While some people opin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in access to these information sources. The telephone was another early scientific ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55902777778 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18523544285 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9761420028 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243674090898 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071621226151 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867539724157 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153953862662 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703384861795 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.