A report written in the 1960's made the following claim; ‘machine translation is slower and less accurate than human translation and there is no immediate or predictable likelihood of machines taking over this role from humans.’ To what extent do you agree
Machines have always been an important component in all the ages. Therefore I disagree with such statement of machines being less reliable than humans.
It is true that humans have made the machines and modify them on interval basis. In the past, people have scarce resources to develop accurate machines therefore there was quite possibility that machines might have some bugs and inaccurate translation software. As humans are pioneer of machines therefore if we are blaming on machines then ultimately humans skills are being blamed. For example, mathematical configuration or translation passages installed now and even in past were are all human efforts so how machines can be blamed as machines are not self-made but a mere creativity of humans.
One thing that can be considered for claiming the inaccuracy of machines probably would be the inefficient users that actually operated them. People in the past were not as educated and well verse with the technology. Most of the people were skeptical to accept the change. Let's say we are currently living transformer lives where high technology is being introduced and suddenly we may ask to stop using the machines and live the manual working life. It would not be easy for us to accept the change. Similarly, People in past were reluctant to accept the change in the system and therefore they themselves make errors in operating the system and ultimately machines were being blamed.
Machines were and are the most useful gadget we had and have in our lives. They have made our lives more convenient though we do have some drawbacks using such operating technology but come what may machines are incomparable to humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-03 | fatemehbagheri | 11 | view |
| 2017-07-21 | noorali.bhayani@srb.gos.pk | 73 | view |
| 2016-08-04 | moj20020 | 67 | view |
- Your recently bought a TV set from a well know store in town However the TV worked fine for only three days then it shut down for no reason You went back to the store to talk to the manager but he was not available so you explained the situation to the sa 43
- Some people fail in school, but end up being successful in life.Why do you think that is the case? What is the most important thing to succeed in life. 73
- Things like puzzles board games and pictures can contribute to a child s development What would you give a child to help him her develop and why Give details and examples in your explanation 88
- Travel to study is over rated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 73
- Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...an important component in all the ages. Therefore I disagree with such statement of machi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...passages installed now and even in past were are all human efforts so how machines c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...le were skeptical to accept the change. Lets say we are currently living transformer...
^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay machines are incomparable to humans.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08664259928 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65697103977 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537906137184 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1502068136 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179471269475 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711978371734 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053744977123 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123803830725 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061416959121 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.