The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts compare the differences of the average household spending by four major categories between Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, as can be seen, spending on food and housing accounted for the largest proportions of expenses in both countries. Another visible trend is that Japanese expenditure on transport and health care was twice as expensive as Malaysia.
On the one hand, 34% of expenses in Malaysia, which showed for the largest part, was for housing, while the figure for Japan was lower, with 21%. In terms of food, the figure for Malaysia was slightly more than that for Japan, at 27% and 24% respectively.
On the other hand, the percentage of transport in the spending of Japan (20%) was two times than that in expenses of inhabitants in Malaysia, with 12 %. Likewise, people in both nations spend the lowest proportion of their expenditure on health care, with 6% and 3% respectively of total incomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In some countries parents expect their children to spend long time studying both in and after school and have less free time What are the positive and negative effects on children and society they live in 92
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcentage of transport in the spending of Japan 20% was two times than that in exp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96794871795 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71107225565 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.9516226681 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228790797632 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113022733781 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120394135897 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161711863773 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136831224962 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.