Computers and modems have made it possible for office workers to do much of their work from home instead of working in offices every day. Working from home should be encouraged as it is good for workers and employers.
It is true that people work at home with the modern technologies being much more convenient compared to going to the companies. While I accept that this may suit for managers, I disagree that working at home is better for employees.
On the one hand, there a variety of reasons why employers gain some benefits when their staffs working from their houses. One reason is that directors can narrow the generation gap between family members. As they can control their employees everywhere by technology devices, so they may be combined their work with their family life like travel or family affairs, which is a major advantage if they are parents of young children or they have old people to look after. In addition, employers can save a great deal of money, particularly in the big cities to rent a place where workers can work, invest facilities and pay for associated services. Thus, office workers take place their tasks from home is the best way in terms of managers in comparison with going to the companies every day.
On the other hand, there are many different drawbacks for workers who work at home without going to the offices. Firstly, they will have a hard time nurturing essential skills. To be specific, if they work in a corporation, they will have a good opportunity to work with lots of colleagues from different backgrounds, which enables them to gain directly the relevant experience ; while if they work at home, they will not know how to build strong relationship with other employees and how to manage conflicts. Secondly, they cannot approach to the professional environment as the corporate culture which includes physical appearance, working style and team building activities.
In conclusion, it is certain that working at home through the leading edge technologies brings many advantages for employers, but this is by no means it is suitable for employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-18 | huelinh178 | 89 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | Thao Anh194 | 87 | view |
- Too much emphasis is placed on going university for academic study People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Some people prefer to work for the same company, whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently. Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ery day. On the other hand, there are many different drawbacks for workers who work at home ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00952380952 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71842626745 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574603174603 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1782450975 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372808647121 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137486608926 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751220503724 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230368611212 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228570700222 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.