TPO INTEGRATED 26
The lecture and the reading both discuss the invasion of the zebra mussels. The reading states that the invasion of the zebra mussels cause a serious threat to the fish population in all North America, and enumerates three reasons of support. However, the lecture refutes. It claims that there are many methods to control the invasion of the zebra mussels.
First of all, the reading argues that the invasion of the zebra mussels may not stopped, because it caused by human. Moreover ships responsible for spreading out the mussels. The lecture disagrees. It claims that in the pas people had not enough knowledge to control the spread of the mussels. According to the professor, today people are able to control the mussel’s invasion by requiring the ships to empty the ballast water near the ocean, which kill the mussels by the salt water.
In addition, the reading claims that the mussels can adapt to any habitat. For example thin the North American ocean there are no predator to the mussels. However the lecture opposes this point by saying that in the beginning there will be no predator, but after that the local aquatic birds will know that there is new kind of food. The birds would eat a lot of the mussels.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that the zebra mussels compete with many fish for there food. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that it is true that the zebra compete with the fish for there plankton. But there are other kinds of fish the get positive impact from the zebra mussel’s invasion, such as the bottom fish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- tpo integrated 30 73
- TPO INTEGRATED 49 65
- tpo integrated 30 73
- TPO INTEGRATED 46 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ot stopped, because it caused by human. Moreover ships responsible for spreading out the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 131, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'predators'?
Suggestion: predators
...n the North American ocean there are no predator to the mussels. However the lecture opp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n there are no predator to the mussels. However the lecture opposes this point by sayin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, may, moreover, so, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31634023813 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47037037037 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8875552226 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6470588235 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378135348511 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114312405371 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849573399284 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231072048932 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576613451952 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.