In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is speculated that a global deficiency of life essences will impede the well-being of living creatures, including our human. Therefore, a pattern of population demands authorities to invest extra financial force on discovering new habitable environments in space, Mars is one to be considered. In my opinion, I think the idea should completely be approved for the following reasons.
Firstly, a demographic explosion in terms of quantity that our concurrent society is facing, which can be the root origin of any kind of criminal activities as well as chronical epidemics, urges results from space study. As human-being increase in number, the lack of land and accommodation for the ever-increasing rate of birth is becoming more terrifying, especially in urban areas. Although governments have always struggle to search for a solution, the outcomes have never been successful because tackling densely populated cities problems requires massive budget but the impacts are only short-termed. Therefore, resorting to an alternative planet seems to be the utmost righteous act that governments should implement. Such idea would not be actualized without necessary investment to employ scientists or establish research facilities, emphasizing the demand for sponsorships.
Secondly, natural resource depletion has become an urgent matter causing many political crises and waste immense amount of national treasury, searching for new suitable home for human being would eradicate this chaos. This has even become more vital when we acknowledge the practical situation of the non-stopping over-exploitation of fossil-fuels and water reservoir for short-term benefits. In the long term, essential elements for sustaining life will drain, and human life will be put at stake since there is no fuel to maintain production or transportation. Therefore, if there is even a fragile hope to discover a new environment, people should value the opportunity and invest money in researches on the space to ensure the survival of human race.
In conclusion, I strongly suppose that financial investments on discovering another planet as a new home to replace the Earth are reasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | hana99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | vantran2297 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | dungha23 | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | sho2501 | 89 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions? 60
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respo 56
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Some people choose to have their first child at an older age. What are the reasons? Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'struggled'.
Suggestion: struggled
...areas. Although governments have always struggle to search for a solution, the outcomes ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60909090909 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20654318417 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1709951866 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.384615385 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14475543986 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531099609898 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349224945121 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839214737635 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217042161333 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.