the graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
writing a report.
The bar chart highlights the information about the average annual gross domestic product growth in term of 3 types of countries: developed countries, developing countries adopting a global approach to business or globalizers and developing countries adopting a non-global approach to business or non-globalizers from the 1960s to the1990s.
Overall, It can be observed that there was a gradual downward trend in the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries. And that of globalizers followed a contrasting trend.
If we look at the average annual gross domestic product growth of wealthy countries, it started at just over 4.5%, which meant that it was the highest percent among 3 types of countries. After that, the figure fell down steadily to nearly 3.0% in the 1970s and continuously decreased by approximately 1.0% in the 1990s. By contrast, the average domestic product growth of globalizers began at the lowest position compared with 2 remaining types of countries, at around 15% in the 1960s. But in the last three periods of time, the figure increased significantly and reached a high of nearly 5.0% in the 1990s.
As regards non-globalizers, there was a slight increase in the first two periods of time, from nearly 2.5% in the 1960s to just over 3.0% in the 1970s. Following this the figure dropped considerably, making it slightly lower than the others, nearly 1.0% in the 1980s and around 1.5% in the 1990s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-14 | Ben.Afshar | 75 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | Nurimov Elyor | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Lien Huynh | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Anh Thi | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | myname95 | view |
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV 76
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- Internet users as percentage of population 61
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12340425532 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94108746437 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7244079122 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291211385908 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103630315831 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118240457639 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177016499775 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127552636463 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.