This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5,000 couples.
The graph describes data about eight famous places for British newly-married couples to spend their honeymoon in 2010.5000 couples took part in this survey.
It can be clearly seen that there were two destinations which were chosen by more than half of couples and other half were separated into other six places .
The most popular two places were Thailand and Bali which were chosen by 1410 and approximately 1300 couples, while the least popular destinations were The Lake District and Spain. The Lake District were considered by only 124 couples, when 140 couples of Britain decided to fly to Spain as their honeymoon destination. Costa Rica was the third well-known place with 750 couples choosing to spend honeymoon there. This amount were similar to The Maldives (600). These were followed by The Greek Islands which were considered by 432 couples. Paris was the next place that attracted about 209 couples.
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 84
- The graph below shows hoe prices of "high-tech gadgets" changed over time in Somecountry. 78
- The graph below gives information on wages of some country over a ten year period 78
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph describes data about eight fam...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...00 couples took part in this survey. It can be clearly seen that there were t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of couples and other half were separated into other six places . The most...
^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lf were separated into other six places . The most popular two places wer...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e separated into other six places . The most popular two places were Thailan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47481946239 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4868402823 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177736346556 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832543343072 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771762023788 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144632647948 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100605427143 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.