Some people think that university students should only study one special subject. Others
think that universities should encourage students to study a range of subjects in addition to a
special area. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the number of tertiary students studying various subjects in addition to their specialized subject, raising many questions about the practical application. Although the advantages associated with this pattern could be pronounced, concentrating on one special subject bestows more benefits.
On the one hand, it should be acknowledged that studying on various subjects could lead to positive consequences. Learning different subjects means more working skills for different job specifications, eliminating the possibilities of limited employment options. In fact, students majoring in computer program development in post-secondary institutions have a penchant for studying foreign languages, which promotes their employment prospects with many opportunities of promising jobs with high remuneration and benefits in kind in multinational corporations.
On the other hand, it is highly recommended that post-secondary students focus on one specialized discipline. This is invariably associated with a higher degree of concentration of this subject, developing necessary skills for fueling academic attainments in that subject. For example, an English-specialized student could freely acquire practical skills such as listening and pronunciation ones based on the personal preferences to facilitate the language proficiency and flexibility. Therefore it would act as an incentive for their career progression when involved in a specific profession related to English.
In conclusion, Focusing on only one major subject could culminate in many desirable impacts especially in climbing their promotion ladder in the future. Additionally, post-secondary institutions should reduce the content of the curriculum to release the studying burdens for students to enhance their concentration level on the specialized subject.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-09 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- the pie chart shows the percentages of expenditure on different items in USA 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it 11
- Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education but other people claim that it is the individual’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations > 67
- Some people believe that a country can benefit a lot from university education Others believe that sending a large number of young students to go to university leads to unemployment Discuss both views and give your opinions 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e language proficiency and flexibility. Therefore it would act as an incentive for their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28015564202 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49034828507 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5953307393 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4487943909 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.727272727 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24175445894 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102888899208 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650033382912 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167633074621 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384587290714 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.44 12.4159519038 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.