the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007.
A glance at the graph provided reveals the information about how much of acid rain emissions were produced by four categories in the UK during a period from 1990 to 2007.
Overall, it is apparent that the total amount of acid rain gases in the UK saw a considerable fall over the period in question. In addition, the most common reason causing the production of acid rain emissions was the electricity, gas and water supply sector in 1990, which was replaced by the other industry sector in the last year.
Looking at the detail, a high of approximately 3.3 million tonnes of acid rain gases came from the electricity, gas and water supply sector in 1990, then plunged by around 2.8 million tonnes in 2007. Regarding transport and communication sector, it started at about 0.7 million tonnes of emissions in 1990. This figure remained stable at the end of the period after a fluctuating trend, reached a peak of around 1 million tonnes in 2005.
If we look at the domestic sector, the amount of emissions it produced began at a low of 0.6 million tonnes in 1990 and fell steadily to nearly 0.4 million tonnes in 2007, which meant that it caused less than the other sectors. Likewise, a small decline saw in terms of the other industry sector, started at around 2.1million tonnes of emission in 1990, then dipped slightly at about 1.2 million tonnes in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-22 | Huyen Trang | 67 | view |
| 2017-08-22 | Huyen Trang | 67 | view |
| 2017-08-22 | Huyen Trang | 67 | view |
| 2017-08-22 | Huyen Trang | 67 | view |
| 2017-08-22 | Huyen Trang | 67 | view |
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 87
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV? 61
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
- This chart shows the top eight destination for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5000 couples. 56
- the diagrams below give info on transport and car use in Edmonton. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, regarding, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69456066946 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53913884299 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493723849372 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3234965622 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250905820988 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131213742967 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796118202244 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185780110401 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671770447967 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.