TPO 48, writing 1
The article states that the population of frogs have declined around the world which can leads to serious consequences for ecosystems and human health and provides three methods to solve the problem. However, the professor explains that the proposed solutions are not practical and refutes each of author's methods.
First, the reading explains that frogs are being harmed by pesticides and proposes prohibition law to stop the using of harmful pesticides by farmers. The professor refutes this solution by stating that this method is not economically feasible and is unfair. She states that if the farmers which are close to frogs habitats stop the using of chemicals, they will loss their competition power with farmers of other areas.
Second, the article claims that fungus is major factor in declining the frog population and medication and treatment should be used to kill fungus. However, the professor contends that treatment is not practical in large scale for each frogs so this solution is not economical and costs a lot.
Third, the reading avers that frog population are in decline because their nature are threatened, so people should save their habitats. The lecture opposes this point by saying that frog's living nature is not directly influenced by human activities such as excessive water use or development in that areas. The professor explains that destruction of habitats is because of global warming which leads to drying of wetland habitats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-22 | alishan2009 | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ave declined around the world which can leads to serious consequences for ecosystems ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'frog'.
Suggestion: frog
... that if the farmers which are close to frogs habitats stop the using of chemicals, t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24255319149 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58467818886 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540425531915 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1053634336 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.2 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422801349175 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164002005824 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100500285848 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259599533592 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342995745952 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.