the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how many millions of barrels per day oil were produced and their changes in 6 countries throughout a 20-year period from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, It is obvious that there were upward trends in oil production of all 6 nations, particularly the most significant increase can be seen in Saudi Arabia. Another interesting point is that the amount of oil produced was the highest in Saudi Arabia and the lowest in Qatar over the period in question.
In 1990, the amount of oil produced in Saudi Arabia was over 8 million of barrels per day, the rose steadily, reaching a peak of over 14 million of barrels per day. By contrast, only a half million of barrels per day were produced in Qatar in 1990. the the figure almost remained stable at the end of the period after a marginal increase in 2000.
Looking at the oil production in the other countries, there was a slight increase. In 1990, the figure in Iraq started at about 3 million of barrels per day compared to around 2 million of barrels per day in the other three countries. The amount of oil produced in the UAE did not see a rise in 2000 like the others but the figure peaked at over 4 million of barrels per day in Iran and at almost 4 million of barrels per day in Iraq, Kuwait and the UAE.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | Tan Thao | 100 | view |
- the maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV 52
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 72
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...er day were produced in Qatar in 1990. the the figure almost remained stable at th...
^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...er day were produced in Qatar in 1990. the the figure almost remained stable at the en...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...er day were produced in Qatar in 1990. the the figure almost remained stable at the en...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38396624473 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41698871819 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472573839662 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4589852929 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122758484492 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676110951883 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499614453531 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969874709163 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437424751293 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.